Mexico´s president take on the wall boarder situation

Mexico´s new leader: "Nobody will threaten us" with wall.

So recently, Mexico´s president made a ´comeback´ to the America-Mexico boarder wall conversation.

This theme started when Donald Trump said that if he ended up being electec president, he would build a wall boarder between  USA and Mexico. Lopez Obrador´s opinion and speech is really similar to what Peña Nieto said in the USA election season, but thats nos the problem. The problem begins when we see Trump´s opinion about this situation. In my opinion, and probably the moayority of the latin america comunity agrees, is that when Trump says that Mexico is going to pay all the costs that would come with the wall iniciative is a really unfair and unreal proyect. First of all, the wall is his idea, his proyect, so is his responsibility to talk with all the parts that have something to do with this, in this case, Mexico´s people and goverment. Then he justifies his desition by showing all the stadistics and proves that mexico y a very dangerous country and they have to make a more secure boarder between the two countrys.
 The point is, i think Trump is basing his speech on personal opinions, and manipulating his words to get the people to agree with him, without looking outside the shell and taking mexicans opinion, knowing that they have a big influence on his desitions, and otherwise.

Juan Pablo Suárez


Comentarios

  1. María Fernanda C11 de agosto de 2018 a las 10:14 a.m.

    I agree with Juan Pablo, i think is not fair that mexicans have to pay for this wall, that is Trumps idea; treating all mexicans as dangerous people for me is really silly, you cant generalize an entire country just for some people who actually do bad things at the USA. Its okay that he wants to protect his country obviously, but that's not way, creating a wall (imagine it had to be a very long wall).

    ResponderBorrar
  2. Unknown12 de agosto de 2018 a las 12:13 p.m.

    Thats absolutley right, when you said “The point is, i think Trump is basing his speech on personal opinions, and manipulating his words to get the people to agree with him, without looking outside …” That’s exactly what he does, he create his own opinion and his own true, which is not a common good.

    ResponderBorrar
  3. Unknown14 de agosto de 2018 a las 6:16 p.m.

    In my opinion, both countries are violent in their own way, I think the wall will not benefit EE. UU., Trump only thinks about being part of the history of EE. UU., Create a wall and charge your costs to Mexico, which is not a country with sufficient economic solvency.

    ResponderBorrar
  4. Carolina Giraldo15 de agosto de 2018 a las 3:51 p.m.

    Este comentario ha sido eliminado por el autor.

    ResponderBorrar
  5. Carolina Giraldo15 de agosto de 2018 a las 3:53 p.m.

    I am agree that Mexico does not have to pay for the idea of Trump, because Mexico is not to blame for the xenophobia that Trump feels towards them and towards the Latin American countries in general, considered that Trump has all the power and money and if he wants to build a wall he can build it with his own resources, but I am not agree with the wall or with the Trump’s idealization.

    ResponderBorrar
  6. Unknown15 de agosto de 2018 a las 7:37 p.m.

    i think that Trump is an expert manipulator, he knows what the people "wants" but he takes decisions that are not apropiate but he doesn't care about it, he only says the first thing is passing by his mind and he doesn't think in the possible consequences.

    ResponderBorrar
  7. Unknown7 de septiembre de 2018 a las 2:44 p.m.


    I agree, but I also believe that Trum, in his desire for power and acceptance, would seek to please the most radical and most important sectors of American society, that is why this kind of thing will continue to happen.

    ResponderBorrar

Publicar un comentario

Entradas más populares de este blog

Argentine Senate Rejects Legal, Elective Abortion

https://www.voanews.com/a/argentine-senate-rejects-legal-elective-abortion/4520024.html Argentine Senate Rejects Legal, Elective Abortion When we are talking about abortion, we should to know that is a community problem, education problem, medical problem, but in countries like Colombia, Argentina, Chile that conform South America (which supposed to are non-secularize) it’s a Religion problem as well. The political decisions should be taken by congressmen, politics, and people who are able to make the answers for this kind of problems. In Argentina the Catholic Church has lost influence and moral authority, why? Apart from the secularization, they are in a clerical caste and avalanche of sex abuse scandals that makes impossible to bring a correct opinion about this reform. For another way and wrapping in what it’s important to us, i n Argentina, abortion is only allowed in cases of rape and risks to a woman’s health  what the constitution want to do is allowed to the wome...
Leer más

In Haiti, Slight Progress for LGBT Rights Seen as Victory

https://www.voanews.com/a/in-haiti-slight-progress-for-lgbt-rights-is-seen-as-victory/4528161.html It's always going to be hard for me reading about discrimination and harassment, no matter where is happening. I'm a straight guy who could be qualified as cis-gender. I need to be clear on that because I'm not going to talk about my sexuality or my identity. It's necessary for all of us to think in the people on their coindition: human-beings. The LGBT situation in Haiti is the living proof that the whole world needs to change its mind, because we are constructing our society on discrimination and we are normalizing it. The story the author wrote on the news talks about a transgender woman who basically lived on hell due to her own identity. It confuses me all the time when there's discrimination and people who practices it forget about the person that they're messing with, because it's a person, and no matter what he or she is feeling or what he or she wa...
Leer más